Monday, July 18, 2011

Back to the Past: review of three movies from Jan Troell. "Everlasting Moments", "The Emigrants" and "The New Land".

The appearance in 2008 of "Everlasting Moments" (Maria Larssons ögonblick Evigan), of Swedish filmmaker Jan Troell, gave back to the cinephiles of the world the opportunity to marvel at the miracle of the  moving image, in a succession of sepia photographs and social realism.

Troell's strategy is to place a character inside a family in an historical context, and let them develop within that past in evocative vignettes and small scenes of a deep didacticism. In "Everlasting Moments" our guide for the early decades of the twentieth Century in Sweden is Maria (Maria Heiskanen), wife and mother who discovers the aesthetic possibilities of the world through a camera. The camera as an object joins Maria and her partner in marriage, and its use releases her of the misfortunes of daily living, including the domestic violence partly derived from proletarian enslavement, a mixture of Soviet realism and Dickensian misery. Some film critics say that Maria bears the chauvinism prevalent in his time as a dominated female complicit with its own tormentor. Despite this impression, Maria takes the necessary steps for the continuity and progress of her family, that finally comes when her husband Sigfrid becomes a capitalist. It is then that she can stop feeling guilty about using her camera, which until then was an escape to the bourgeois world personified in her potential lover, owner of a photography shop. 


This assertion of individual power in pursuit of family progress is shared by the Swedish immigrants to whom Troell dedicated two films in the 1970s, "The Emigrants" and its sequel "The New Land". In these two films, Liv Ullman and Max Von Sidow leave an authoritarian and petrified Sweden where nature does not give respite towards a free America, for anyone who wants to take the land stolen from the aborigines. The road is arduous and full of disease, and the reward seems to be just more hard work, but Troell does an excellent job on emphasizing the tangible progress for the rural farmer, the daily optimism and dedication of the pioneer that believes more in his own capabilities than in an uncaring God who takes the most beloved. Although the viewer might think that the ultimate goal is money, being precisely an item highlighted throughout the second film, is not the mad pursuit of extraordinary profits represented by the California Gold Rush, but the traditional work ethic that ultimately pays. The pioneer has left all his sweat on the ground, and though his family has suffered the cost, in the final moments we have a peek at the beginning of a great American lineage, already in the era of the modern proletariat. Some scenes in "The New Land" are dominated by psychedelic drums and zooms from the seventies, while the horror genre music interspersed in "The Emigrants" is subtle like a sledgehammer, but given these warnings and used to the leisure pace, these two films offer an essential sociological and audiovisual experience not to be missed. 

Note of interest: there is a scene in "The New Land" taken entirely by George Lucas for "The Empire Strikes Back".  Many science fiction sagas are just allegories of the conquest of the West. 

Links:
"Everlasting Moments" (Maria Larssons ögonblick Evigan), 2008.
"The Emigrants" (Utvandrarna), 1971.
"The New Land" (Nybyggarna), 1972.

Saturday, March 5, 2011

"Now I Pronounce You Chuck & Larry", Dennis Dugan (2010)

An humanist comedy, crafted by the expert hands of Alexander Payne and that gentle spokesman for middle America, Adam Sandler.  This movie is funny and intelligent, kid you not.  "Brockeback Mountain" alienated scores of straight men with its promises of warm homosexual kisses, and when the moment came, it was glacial and timid, but still hurt to watch it: I never believed for a second that those people loved each other.  "INPYCaL" attacked the problem head-on, giving you Jessica Biel in panties, corageous firefighters and even Tila Tequila.  But there is a catch, see? Chuck and Larry, despite being straight, really love each other, and they don´t need to kiss to be the gayest couple in the mainstream cinema of the 21st Century.  Chuck and Larry learn what it means to be gay in the  United States, not exactlty the paradise that the guardians of Political Correctness want you to believe.  They equally joke about gays, fat men, ugly women, blacks and straight whites, but they know when enough is enough, explaining that some despicable words in the English language are equally insulting (nigger = faggot = kike).  "The Kids Are Allright" tried to make lesbians acceptable by making them almost heterosexual, "INPYCaL" instead tells you that gays are not like you at all, and it should not matter.  Differently from "Brokeback...", Chuck and Larry earned their kiss, and I would not think less of them if they don´t do it in front of the audience (3+/5).
Pablo Podhorzer ("white" & straight).

IMDb: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0762107/
Armond White (black & gay) review: http://www.nypress.com/article-16861-bosom-buddies.html
Nathan Lee (Village Voice, also gay): http://www.villagevoice.com/2007-07-10/film/queer-as-folk/

This film has a meagre 14% of positive reviews according to the Rottentomatoes aggregate engine, proving that consensus sometimes is downright wrong.

Friday, March 4, 2011

"Exit Through the Gift Sop", Banksy (2010)

Banksy is a real artist.  Instead of reading my comments, please link to his website and be amazed: http://www.banksy.co.uk

Ok, now the movie:
It works as an introduction to street art, and it works as social commentary about the commoditization of art in general.  Also speaks lots about real art (profound) and a pale imitation of it (pseudo-profound). Armond White should like this film, because it addresses exactly the kind of problem that White is speaking about when he rambles against Fincher, Nolan and Arronofsky.  The mainstream perceives the movies of those directors as being art, but they are more aking to Mr. Brainwash work than Banksy´s ouvres.  "Exit..." is funny, swift and poignant, probably the best of last year with "Scott Pilgrim". If connections had been made with other arts, it could have been perfect (4+/5).

IMDb: www.imdb.com/title/tt1587707/

"Tron: Legacy", Joseph Kosinski (2010)

In the next five mimutes I will think of a better storyline for TRON´s world that the one in the movie.  Imagine that the son of the Dude needs to connect the old computer to the intranet of his company for some arbitrary reason, so you see the shoot of him putting the telephone cable into the thing.  Then he gets sucked into the machine.  Everything is as we remember from the 1980s, but then CLU finds that now he can extend his reign utilizing more resources thorugh the intranet, so the CGI becomes 21st Century.  Then in the real world the managers put a new series of games online, and the games we see inside the machine would be justified. Dude´s son light-cycle could be controlled by Users, and we can crosscut from a frat-house of college boys playing online to the "reality" of the game in the machine.  CLU attempts to invade the Internet as a whole like a virus, to impose "order" against peer-sharing and whatnot, and we see how something really bad happens in the real world (mmm, an airport going crazy, etc) and after meeting several characters (the Searcher Algoritm, always working for Google) that help the Dude´s Son, CLU is defeated, and as a bonus an OS composed of the best friendly programs is now freely available and the Net thrives.  It took five minutes.  I am a genious.
So, the movie itself is not worth of your precious time, but if you can fast-forward you can watch three sequences with some interest: Disc Wars, the light-cycles, and its airborne version at the end.  The rest is suppossed profundity, and an attempt to generate a serious mitology where there is none.  Well, if the trick worked for "Inception" why would not work here?  The commitee doing this movie should have gone full-Nolan and put half an hour more of exposition and vacuous philosophy, maybe then the fanboys would consider it to be worthy of the herd.
One question: why Dude´s son is bleeding in the movie when he was converted into digital format by the laser? Another one: how can I use the spellchek function in Blogger?  Enjoy my typos..

"Tangled", Nathan Greno, Byron Howard (2010)

Disney´s "Rapunzel" fails miserably to update that staple of the company: the teenager princess musical.  The CGI animation is pretty good, but you can see all of the strings trying to pull you to feel something at the right moments.  It does not work, we have seen this done better countless times.
The anachronistic dialogue is tuned to attract the pre-pubescent girlie crowd, but it is so obvious that takes the viewer outside the film.  Dialogue can be snappy, but doesn´t need to be at odds with the surrounding world of the characters.  It is marketing at its worst, thinking that the audience is so stupid that cannot understand classic dialogue without modern references on it. The musical part is mostly innocuous, a disservice to all great Disney musicals.
This Disney villain is not overtly evil, and the sudden ending to her predicament is not at all warranted.  Lets see: an old woman, presented as a witch but that doesn´t have powers kidnaps a baby (Rapunzel) that has magical hair, that can make the old woman live forever young.  So the baby grows up thinking about this woman as her mother.  What this woman did is terrible, yet it is clear that Rapunzel cannot dismiss her as quickly as it happens here, and a half second shot of a futile attempt at salvation is not enough to clear Rapunzel morally.  If the old lady did not try to kill one character, Rapunzel would be put in a very interesting spot: let her die or to maintain her young forever?  The step-mother is not wrong, if Rapunzel gets out there everybody will want a piece of her hair, so she will be forever doomed to sing her days away.
In the end, is another Disney story about an American teenager fighting with her parents about going out to have fun, hardly classic material.  It is fun as it is disposable, and for a movie so many years in the making, it is a shame and a travesty. (3/5).

IMDb: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0398286/

Armond White: http://www.nypress.com/article-21903-twisted-tale.html
AW sustains that this movie is a gimmick-machine.  American cinema has his roots in vaudeville and the medium as a bag of tricks, and lately is the only clear aspect of lauded mainstream films.  Movies as circus, but not even as moving, only the cheap magician, not even the clowns.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

"Mother and Child", Rodrigo García (2010)

Excellent performances are hampered by some reactionary plot twists that overpowers the actors´efforts with the ideology of the writer-director.  García punishes the most interesting character with a fate straight out of religious allegories, killing the movie in the process. (2/5)

The following reviewer put my thoughts online when the movie was released, and I agree with his words:

Slant magazine review by Andrew Schenker: http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/review/mother-and-child/4798

IMDb: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1121977/

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

"Carancho" (Vulture), Pablo Trapero (2010)

Pablo Trapero came from San Justo, a suburb in the south-west of the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area.  San Justo is dirty, corrupt and hopeless.  Now it has a new shopping-mall, but it does not appear in "Carancho".  In this movie the only thing that shines on the dark streets is one of the best actors of the world, the incredible Ricardo Darín, playing an ambulance-chaser ex-lawyer working for a shady organization which takes the cases of accident victims, wins them and pockets most of the money extracted from the insurance companies.  All of this, of course, with the full knowledge of the local police and the local hospital authorities.
The movie has some tonal discrepancies, a shift from naturalism to gritty film-noir, and too much despair for my taste, but many scenes are good (even virtuous if predictable; you know what Trapero is doing, and you´re waiting for it as you wait for the serial killer in a horror movie).  It makes for a good time at the cinema, if you can accept a couple of superfluous intimate scenes. The final shot is unwarranted, but Polanski did a lot worse this year, and if an old master can make mistakes, a young filmmaker can be forgiven (3+/5).

 IMDb: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1542852

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

"The Ghost Writer", Roman Polanski (2010)

What a dissapointment!  The movie is beautifully shot and has a menacing ambience, but the central mystery is innocuous and politically naive.  The final shot of the film belongs in "Final Destination" and not here.  There is more socially relevant info in the end credits of "The Other Guys" than in this political thriller that doesn´t have too much of both.  Performances are excellent, and the central subject of the movie are the ghosts pulling the levers of the machine.  Other than that, a simple toy for simple minds (2/5).

Rotten Tomatoes link: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10012063-ghost_writer/